Satyagraha Means ……………

Satyagraha (Sanskrit, meaning “Truth-force”) was a term coined by Mahatma Gandhi to express his philosophy that non-violence is a power that can transform adversaries into friends and resolve issues of injustice and oppression. Gandhi developed this philosophy in his struggles against racial discrimination in South Africa and eventually employed satyagraha tactics against British rule in India during his campaign for Indian independence. His insistence on absolute non-violence as the power of truth won him international recognition for his peaceful way of dealing with conflicts.

The word “satyagraha” utilizes words that derive from the Sanskrit language: Satya is the Sanskrit word for “truth” and agraha means “to grasp or hold.” These two words compounded mean “grasping/holding the truth.” Gandhi, himself, explains the origins of this term as follows:
None of us knew what name to give to our movement. I then used the term “passive resistance” in describing it. …As the struggle advanced, the phrase “passive resistance” gave rise to confusion and it appeared shameful to permit this great struggle to be known only by an English name. Again, that foreign phrase could hardly pass as current coin among the community. A small prize was therefore announced in Indian Opinion to be awarded to the reader who invented the best designation for our struggle. We thus received a number of suggestions. … Shri Maganlal Gandhi was one of the competitors and he suggested the word sadagraha, meaning “firmness in a good cause.” I liked the word, but it did not fully represent the whole idea I wished it to connote. I therefore corrected it to “satyagraha.” Truth (satya) implies love, and firmness (agraha) engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force. I thus began to call the Indian movement Satyagraha, that is to say, the Force which is born of Truth and Love or non-violence…

Gandhi described “satyagraha” as follows:

Its root meaning is holding onto truth, hence truth-force. I have also called it love-force or soul-force. In the application of satyagraha, I discovered in the earliest stages that pursuit of truth did not admit of violence being inflicted on one’s opponent but that he must be weaned from error by patience and sympathy. For what appears to be truth to the one may appear to be error to the other. And patience means self-suffering. So the doctrine came to mean vindication of truth, not by infliction of suffering on the opponent, but on oneself.[3]

Defining success

In traditional violent and nonviolent conflict, the goal is to defeat the opponent or frustrate the opponent’s objectives, or to meet one’s own objectives despite the efforts of the opponent to obstruct these. In satyagraha, by contrast, these are not the goals. “The Satyagrahi’s object is to convert, not to coerce, the wrong-doer.”[4] Success is defined as cooperating with the opponent to meet a just end that the opponent is unwittingly obstructing. The opponent must be converted, at least as far as to stop obstructing the just end, for this cooperation to take place.

Means and ends

The theory of satyagraha sees means and ends as inseparable. The means used to obtain an end are wrapped up and attached to that end. Therefore, it is contradictory to try to use unjust means to obtain justice or to try to use violence to obtain peace. As Gandhi wrote: “They say, ‘means are, after all, means.’ I would say, ‘means are, after all, everything.’ As the means so the end…”[5]
Gandhi rejected the idea that injustice should, or even could, be fought against “by any means necessary”—the use of violent, coercive, unjust means, produces resulted that will necessarily embed that injustice. To those who preached violence and called nonviolent actionists cowards, he replied: “I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence…. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should, in a cowardly manner, become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonour…. But I believe that nonviolence is infinitely superior to violence, forgiveness is more manly than punishment.”[6]

Satyagraha versus Duragraha

The essence of satyagraha is that it seeks to eliminate antagonisms without harming the antagonists themselves, as opposed to violent resistance, which is meant to cause harm to the antagonist. A satyagrahi, therefore, does not seek to end or destroy the relationship with the antagonist, but instead seeks to transform or “purify” it to a higher level. A euphemism sometimes used for satyagraha is that it is a “silent force” or a “soul force” (a term also used by Martin Luther King Jr. during his famous “I Have a Dream” speech). It arms the individual with moral power rather than physical power. Satyagraha is also termed a “universal force,” as it essentially “makes no distinction between kinsmen and strangers, young and old, man and woman, friend and foe.”[7]
Gandhi contrasted satyagraha (holding on to truth) with duragraha (holding on by force), as in protest meant more to harass than enlighten opponents. He wrote: “There must be no impatience, no barbarity, no insolence, no undue pressure. If we want to cultivate a true spirit of democracy, we cannot afford to be intolerant. Intolerance betrays want of faith in one’s cause.”[8]
Civil disobedience and non-cooperation as practiced under Satyagraha are based on the “law of suffering,”[9] a doctrine that the endurance of suffering is a means to an end. This end usually implies a moral upliftment or progress of an individual or society. Therefore, non-cooperation in Satyagraha is in fact a means to secure the cooperation of the opponent consistently with truth and justice.

Gandhi envisioned satyagraha as not only a tactic to be used in acute political struggle, but as a universal solvent for injustice and harm. He felt that it was equally applicable to large-scale political struggle and to one-on-one interpersonal conflicts and that it should be taught to everyone.[13]
He founded the Sabarmati Ashram to teach satyagraha. He asked satyagrahis to follow the following principles:[14]

  1. Nonviolence (ahimsa)
  2. Truth—this includes honesty, but goes beyond it to mean living fully in accord with and in devotion to that which is true
  3. Non-stealing
  4. Chastity (brahmacharya)—this includes sexual chastity, but also the subordination of other sensual desires to the primary devotion to truth
  5. Non-possession (poverty)
  6. Body-labor or bread-labor
  7. Control of the palate
  8. Fearlessness
  9. Equal respect for all religions
  10. Swadeshi
  11. Freedom from untouchability

On another occasion, he listed seven rules as “essential for every Satyagrahi in India”:[15]

  1. Must have a living faith in God
  2. Must believe in truth and non-violence and have faith in the inherent goodness of human nature which he expects to evoke by suffering in the satyagraha effort
  3. Must be leading a chaste life, and be willing to die or lose all his possessions
  4. Must be a habitual khadi wearer and spinner
  5. Must abstain from alcohol and other intoxicants
  6. Must willingly carry out all the rules of discipline that are issued
  7. Must obey the jail rules unless they are specially devised to hurt his self respect

Rules for satyagraha campaigns

Gandhi proposed a series of rules for satyagrahis to follow in a resistance campaign:[7]

  1. Harbor no anger
  2. Suffer the anger of the opponent
  3. Never retaliate to assaults or punishment; but do not submit, out of fear of punishment or assault, to an order given in anger
  4. Voluntarily submit to arrest or confiscation of your own property
  5. If you are a trustee of property, defend that property (non-violently) from confiscation with your life
  6. Do not curse or swear
  7. Do not insult the opponent
  8. Neither salute nor insult the flag of your opponent or your opponent’s leaders
  9. If anyone attempts to insult or assault your opponent, defend your opponent (non-violently) with your life
  10. As a prisoner, behave courteously and obey prison regulations (except any that are contrary to self-respect)
  11. As a prisoner, do not ask for special favorable treatment
  12. As a prisoner, do not fast in an attempt to gain conveniences whose deprivation does not involve any injury to your self-respect
  13. Joyfully obey the orders of the leaders of the civil disobedience action
  14. Do not pick and choose amongst the orders you obey; if you find the action as a whole improper or immoral, sever your connection with the action entirely
  15. Do not make your participation conditional on your comrades taking care of your dependents while you are engaging in the campaign or are in prison; do not expect them to provide such support
  16. Do not become a cause of communal quarrels
  17. Do not take sides in such quarrels, but assist only that party which is demonstrably in the right; in the case of inter-religious conflict, give your life to protect (non-violently) those in danger on either side
  18. Avoid occasions that may give rise to communal quarrels
  19. Do not take part in processions that would wound the religious sensibilities of any community


Gandhi’s writings on Nazi persecution of the Jews in Germany were controversial. He offered Satyagraha non-violence as a method of combating oppression and genocide, stating:
If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest Gentile German might, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance, but would have confidence that in the end the rest were bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy […] the calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the God-fearing, death has no terror.[16] Gandhi was highly criticized for these statements and responded in another article entitled “Some Questions Answered” where he wrote:

Friends have sent me two newspaper cuttings criticizing my appeal to the Jews. The two critics suggest that in presenting non-violence to the Jews as a remedy against the wrong done to them, I have suggested nothing new… What I have pleaded for is renunciation of violence of the heart and consequent active exercise of the force generated by the great renunciation.[17]

In a similar vein, anticipating a possible attack on India by Japan during World War II, Gandhi recommended satyagraha as a defense:

…there should be unadulterated non-violent non-cooperation, and if the whole of India responded and unanimously offered it, I should show that, without shedding a single drop of blood, Japanese arms—or any combination of arms—can be sterilized. That involves the determination of India not to give quarter on any point whatsoever and to be ready to risk loss of several million lives. But I would consider that cost very cheap and victory won at that cost glorious. That India may not be ready to pay that price may be true. I hope it is not true, but some such price must be paid by any country that wants to retain its independence. After all, the sacrifice made by the Russians and the Chinese is enormous, and they are ready to risk all. The same could be said of the other countries also, whether aggressors or defenders. The cost is enormous. Therefore, in the non-violent technique I am asking India to risk no more than other countries are risking and which India would have to risk even if she offered armed resistance.[18]


  1. M.K. Gandhi, Satyagraha in South Africa (1926, ISBN 978-8172290412).
  2. M.K. Gandhi, Non-violent Resistance (Satyagraha) (Dover Publications, 2001, ISBN 978-0486416069).
  3. M.K. Gandhi, Statement to Disorders Inquiry Committee (1920).
  4. M.K. Gandhi, “Requisite Qualifications” Harijan March 25, 1939.
  5. R.K. Prabhu and U.R. Rao (eds.), “The Gospel Of Sarvodaya,” in The Mind of Mahatma Gandhi (Ahemadabad, India, 1967). Retrieved December 21, 2007.
  6. R.K. Prabhu & U.R. Rao (eds.), Between Cowardice and Violence in The Mind of Mahatma Gandhi (Ahemadabad, India, 1967). Retrieved December 21, 2007.
  7. 7.07.1 M.K. Gandhi, “Some Rules of Satyagraha” Young India (Navajivan) (1930).
  8. R.K. Prabhu & U.R. Rao (eds.), “Power of Satyagraha,” in The Mind of Mahatma Gandhi (Ahemadabad, India, 1967). Retrieved December 21, 2007.
  9. M.K. Gandhi, “The Law of Suffering,” Young India (1920).
  10. M.K. Gandhi, “Pre-requisites for Satyagraha,” Young India (August 1, 1925).
  11. M.K. Gandhi, “Pre-requisites for Satyagraha” Young India (August 1, 1925).
  12. M.K. Gandhi, “A Himalayan Miscalculation,” in The Story of My Experiments with Truth.
  13. M.K. Gandhi, “The Theory and Practice of Satyagraha” Indian Opinion (1914).
  14. M.K. Gandhi, Non-violent Resistance (Satyagraha) (1961), p. 37.
  15. M.K. Gandhi, “Qualifications for Satyagraha” Young India (August 8, 1929).
  16. M.K. Gandhi, “The Jews” Harijan (November 26, 1938).
  17. M.K. Gandhi, “Some Questions Answered” Harijan (December 17, 1938).
  18. M.K. Gandhi, “Non-violent Non-cooperation” Harijan (May 24, 1942), p. 167.

Comments are closed.